Absurdism in the AI Era AI时代的荒诞主义
Essay Series / Bilingual Blog 随笔专栏 / 中英双语
For people trying to stay lucid inside automation's contradictions. 写给想在自动化的矛盾里保持清醒的人。
This section does not ask only what AI can do in the abstract. It asks why, when AI can do a little of everything, work can start feeling more contradictory rather than more coherent. The absurd here is not comedy. It is mismatch: capability expands, activity multiplies, recursion deepens, yet meaning and orientation refuse to stay aligned.
这个板块写的不是“AI 能做什么”这种抽象问题，而是当 AI 什么都能做一点时，工作为什么反而会变得更矛盾而不是更清楚。 这里的“荒诞主义”不是搞笑，也不是姿态，而是一种错位：能力在扩张，动作在增殖，递归在加深，但意义和方向却始终对不齐。
The first essays in this series came from two open-source skills I built myself. One is about subagent delegation discipline. One is about paper revision as structured sprints. A newer conjecture essay asks whether practical significance collapses by the sixth meta-recursion, the governance essay turns that recursive pressure into a note on reflexivity and institutional limits, the UiPath report tests this lens against legacy systems and the agentic automation transition, and the newest interactive diagnostic map turns that line of thought into a matrix for consultants and AI project leaders.
这个系列最早是从我自己做的两个 open-source skill 开始的：一个写给子代理拆分，一个写给论文打磨。现在又加上一篇关于 第六次元递归极限的猜想、一篇可交互的 AI governance maturity model、一篇关于 UiPath、遗留系统与 agentic automation 转型的长报告，以及一张给顾问和 AI 项目负责人使用的交互式诊断地图。
Latest Pieces 最新文章
2026-04-03 · Map 06
An interactive diagnostic matrix linking Gartner's 2026 agentic AI lens, Issue Space 6D, and the Shengxing Conjecture for consultants and AI project leaders who need intersection-specific actions.
一张保留原始交互格式的诊断地图，把 Gartner 2026 的 agentic AI 视角、Issue Space 六维和盛兴猜想接到一起， 给顾问与 AI 项目负责人提供交叉点级别的诊断与行动建议。
2026-04-03 · Report 05
A long-form strategic research report on UiPath's financial reset, regulated-industry relevance, competitive landscape, and why the company still matters when legacy systems and governance constraints remain real.
一篇保留原版阅读排版的长报告，讨论 UiPath 的财务重估、受监管行业位置、竞争格局，以及为什么在遗留系统和治理约束仍然存在时， 它依然有战略意义。
2026-04-01 · Essay 03
A conjecture on the practical limit of recursive reflection: by the sixth iteration of asking for the presuppositions of a claim, the bridge back to action may have collapsed.
一篇关于元递归极限的文章：当你不断追问一个判断的前提，到第六层左右，抽象很可能已经无法再回流到最初观察的行动空间。
2026-03-31 · Essay 04
Built from the Issue Space line of work. This interactive essay asks not just whether an organization has AI governance, but at what level it can reflect on the conditions of its own judgment.
从 Issue Space 这一条研究线延伸出来。它讨论的不是“有没有 AI 治理”，而是一个组织到底能在什么层级上反思自己判断的前提。
2026-03-24 · Essay 01
Built from token-efficient-subagent-decomposition. The essay is not about making multi-agent systems louder. It is about forcing delegation back under the rule of critical paths, clear boundaries, and coordination cost.
从 token-efficient-subagent-decomposition 说起。它讨论的不是怎么让多代理更热闹，而是怎么让拆分这件事 重新服从关键路径、边界和协调成本。
2026-03-24 · Essay 02
Built from PaperSprint. It turns paper revision into sprints, but its deeper point is that no submission decision should ever leave the human author behind.
从 PaperSprint 说起。它把论文修改转成 sprint，但更重要的是，它坚持任何提交决定都必须回到人的最终判断。
Direct Index 直接索引
Index 01 · Core Essays
Index 02 · Adjacent Routes
Why This Name 为什么叫这个名字
01 · Capability / Meaning Gap
In AI workflows, systems often become more capable faster than teams become more interpretive. You can add agents, prompts, drafts, and intermediate artifacts, while the underlying situation remains just as murky.
在 AI workflow 里，系统能力的增长速度，常常快过团队解释问题的速度。你可以增加 agent、prompt、draft 和各种中间产物， 但底层处境依然一样模糊。
02 · Contradiction Persists
The absurd condition begins when teams secretly expect output growth to remove ambiguity. It does not. The contradiction remains, only now it is wrapped in cleaner interfaces and faster cycles.
真正的荒诞，常常开始于团队偷偷期待“产出变多”就能把模糊性一起带走。但它不会。矛盾还在，只是换成了更漂亮的界面和更快的节奏。
03 · Lucid Action
That is why these essays stay close to judgment, sequencing, and final responsibility. The goal is not to erase contradiction. It is to work inside it without handing over the last meaningful decision.
所以这些文章会不断回到判断、节奏和最终责任。目标不是把矛盾一键抹平，而是在矛盾还存在的时候，仍然不把最后那个重要决定交出去。
Continue the Thread 继续这条线索
Treat this as a third entry point beside the book and the author page. If you want to talk about AI diagnosis, workflow design, writing process, or open-source skills, email is the cleanest path.
你可以把这里当作书页和作者页之外的第三个入口。如果你想围绕 AI diagnosis、workflow design、writing process 或 open-source skill 交流，直接发邮件最有效。